The report deals with a new topic, namely
magnetic treatment of drinking water and its effect on farm animals - ruminants, poultry and pigs. Initial field findings are presented,
mainly concerning milk-, meat-, and egg-yields, as well as reproduction.
Positive results were obtained, with
important economic implications for food production.
Although the study is largely experimental,
and. although considerable further work - both experimental and theoretical -
will be needed, findings to-date represent a major breakthrough with
potentialities in other areas, such as algae, fishponds, and vegetable farming.
1. INTRODUCTION
Physical treatment, electrical
or magnetic of water is currently resorted to in industry
as a means of reducing scale formation and removing deposited
scale.(1-4) A local water-and heat-economy survey(5) which covered industrial
enterprises, public facilities, kibbutzim, etc, indicated
65-70% success in solving technological problems in heat exchangers,
steam boilers, cooling towers, solar heating installations,
refrigeration and air-conditioning plants, etc.
Data on magnetic treatment of irrigation
water(10,11) reported on a limited scale in Russia
and China
- indicate (without any attempt at explanation) accelerated ripening
of crops and improved yields.
The theoretical background of the effect in
question is still imperfectly clear, and a wide spectrum of attitudes is
reflected in literature(1,6,7) In spite of the considerable and
variously-oriented research efforts, and of the documented findings regarding
the biological(8,9) and medical effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields- science is still in the dark here. (In this context it is important
to rote that whereas the biological and medical effect are studied under
conditions of direct exposure of the object, water treatment takes place
“upstream" of the point of consumption.)
2. GENERAL BACKGROUND
Israel
can boast a modern agriculture whose innovations have won
world-wide recognition. With regard to crops, efforts are directed at
development of new strains with a view to improved yields and superior
sturdiness; of pesticides and pest-control techniques; of improved
fertilization and irrigation techniques and regimes; of intensive cultivation
methods, vegetative reproduction processes, and technological innovations such
as propagation houses, mechanized harvesting, etc. With regard to animal
husbandry, emphasis is on race improvement, new veterinary remedies,
improved forage and feeding techniques, specific it feed additives,
computerized management, etc. Against the background of these diverse
activities; it is perhaps characteristic that the water factor (both its
drinking and irrigation varieties) has throughout been regarded as “immutable”,
and no attempt was made to modify its specific universal properties - polarity, surface tension, solvent action, etc.
A joint research team of the Technion and
Kibbutz Gevat (Valley
of Jezreel) worked for 9
years on the aspect of scale formation and removal. The study
covered 15 sites - industrial plants, kibbutzim, and public
facilities (shopping centers, hospitals, office buildings) -and a demonstration pilot plant at Gevat. Experiments were conducted
on heat exchangers, membrane units, solar installations and cooling towers;
operating regimes, types of apparatus (four different manufacturers) and
relevant heat- and mass-transfer data(2-4) were examined.
Three years ago the decision was taken to
extend the study to the areas of biology and botany, with a view to
evaluating the beneficial effect of magnetic pretreatment on drinking- and
irrigation water in terms of improved fertility and yields. The experimental
treatment involved orientation-controlled magnetic fields of constant intensity
(generated by “Superior” apparatus (U.S.A.) - in
several sizes and models, as specified below and a laminar flow regime. The
first cycle of experiments took place at a dairy farm, with follow-up on milk
yield, milk fat content, percentage of fertilizations, open days and the
general health aspect of the herd, etc. On the strength of positive findings,
the study was extended to include:
·
Beef calves and sucklings, one week to
three months.
·
Goats (milk and meat).
·
Figs.
·
Poultry (heavy breeding - fertility, eggs and meat)
·
Turkeys (fattening and breeding).
·
Geese (fattening)
The report presents partial findings
obtained in regular follow-up over two years at least, with ±5% reproducibility.
3. LIVESTOCK
(a) Dairy
farm, Gevat
1” RT-1000 apparatus, with magnetic circuit
suitably modified, installed in Jan 1986 in the pipeline supplying the cowpen
troughs. A herd of 150 milk cows was subdivided into a test group
and a control group (the latter given untreated water). The groups were kept
separate in close proximity, under identical climatic conditions and diet
(composition, dosage, schedule), and milked separately three times daily. The
milk yield was determined daily; the fat
content -
once a month; routine veterinary inspections and the
general follow-up were also conducted on a monthly basis. Results were stored
in a data bank with provision for processing. Cumulative milking days after the calving, veterinary events,
calvings, etc. were likewise recorded.
Also once a month the magnet was dismantled
for inspection and cleaning, and reinstalled. The ball-type drain cock was
opened once a week for routine cleaning.
The findings of the first test cycle (Table
1) indicate a higher milk yield in the test groups.
considerable improvement with regard to open days, increased fertilization
values (by up to 10%) and improved health in general.
Test
Group (B)
Control
Group (C)
Herd
Average
Month
Size
of group
Fat%
Milk
yield per head kg/day
Milking
days after calving
Size
of group
Fat%
Milk
yield per head kg/day
Milking
days after calving
Fat%
Milk
yield per head kg/day
Jan
‘86
74
3.34
40.50
101.7
82
3.18
40.6
85.3
3.35
35.04
Febr.
89
3.14
40.60
91.8
88
3.14
40.9
86.2
3.26
36.05
March
87
3.00
41.65
99.4
84
3.06
41.14
96.4
3.13
36.44
April
88
3.17
41.49
110.2
86
3.26
39.97
101.8
3.27
36.06
May
81
2.88
42.64
119.9
79
3.08
39.24
116.9
3.04
35.76
June
84
3.26
38.60
156.3
77
3.31
36.74
143.6
3.29
33.78
July
78
3.28
37.90
161.1
68
3.24
36.15
154.0
3.40
32.65
August
62
2.97
38.35
158.8
52
3.19
37.60
150.7
3.11
33.22
Sept.
70
3.53
33.20
157.6
61
3.74
32.33
160.6
3.58
29.37
Oct.
67
3.39
30.71
140.9
55
3.57
32.10
155.3
3.39
28.24
Nov.
61
3.23
36.57
128.2
64
3.14
35.17
140.8
3.20
30.96
Dec.
74
2.95
36.99
100.6
66
2.89
35.28
100.5
3.02
32.04
Jan.’87
77
3.05
42.70
100.5
68
3.12
40.88
110.0
3.15
33.50
Febr.
81
3.19
41.70
100.0
69
3.03
40.80
97.7
3.13
36.40
March*
90
3.08
40.78
93.3
75
2.95
42.33
90.3
3.07
36.78
April
105
2.75
42.47
116.8
80
2.80
41.79
112.9
3.32
26.31
Av
annual open days
88.8
101.4
In May 1987 the apparatus was switched from
one group to the other, so that their roles were interchanged. As expected,
yields increased in the former control group and decreased in the former test
group.
Parallel to the above series, a 1¼” RT-1250 apparatus was used
from Jan 1986 for two other groups in a neighboring pen – one consisting of heifers and the other of drying-off cows. Results (Table 2) were excellent, with a daily yield increase of
over 2 liters compared with the preceding year. There was also general
improvement in the health of the herd, especially with regard to mastitis (complete disappearance of
udder edema - a common disease in the
herds of the region, the cause of premature dropping-out of choice animals).
TABLE 2 —Comparison
data —
milk yield and fat content; Groups A (heifers) vs. D
(drying—off) and Herd Average (untreated water in 1985, treated water in 1986).
GROUP A
GROUP D
HERD AVERAGE
Month
1985
1986
1985
1986
1985
1986
Jan
28.3
3.2
32.1
3.3
18.2
3.5
22.5
3.9
32.5
3.2
35.0
3.3
Febr.
28.7
3.0
33.2
3.2
23.8
3.5
25.7
3.9
34.1
3.1
36.0
3.2
March
28.4
3.5
33.2
3.0
22.8
3.7
27.2
3.7
32.3
3.4
36.4
3.1
April
28.9
3.3
33.3
3.1
22.7
3.9
27.6
3.6
32.7
3.2
36.0
3.2
May- .
28.8
3.4
33.2
3.0
22.8
3.7
27.8
3.3
31.5
1,4
35.7
3.0
June
27.8
3.4
32.6
3.1
20.3
3.9
25.3
3.6
29.0
3.6
33.7
3.2
July *
29.8
3.2
31.5
3.1
22.2
3.7
24.1
4.0
30.4
3.3
32.6
3.4
August
26.4
3.2
33.3
2.9
21.3
3.9
25.6
3.4
27.3
3.4
33.2
3.1
Sept.
28.3
3.1
28.8
3.3
19.9
4.0
22.2
3.8
28.5
3.3
29.3
3.5
Oct.
27.9
3.4
27.7
3.1
19.9
4.1
21.6
3.5
29.0
3.3
28.2
3.3
Nov.
29.5
3.3
30.2
3.2
20.3
4.0
20.5
3.4
31.7
3.4
32.4
3.3
Dec.
31.6
3.5
32.3
3.0
22.4
4.0
21.0
3.5
32.9
3.5
34.3
3.2
*July through December 1986 protein ration reduced by 15%.
(b) Calves
(Gevat)
Calves are transferred, at
the age of one week, to separate cages where they are kept up to the age of
about two months. During this period they are fed sour milk, and after weaning
are introduced to the regular diet. Weights on admission and discharge, as well
as the dates of weaning, are recorded. Results are given in Table 3 (see also
Appendix A). The test pen comprises two rows of 45 cages each, one row housing
the control group and the other the test group (water treated with 3/4” RT-750
apparatus). Weight gain, general health, response on introduction to roughage,
and special events are recorded.
TABLE 3 — Calving pen report, test••vs.
control group
Test
group 1
Control
group 1
Testgroup 2
Control
group 2
No. of calves
42
42
40
38
Weight on admission kg
39.0
42.0
38.9
40.4
Weight on discharge kg
69.5
68.6
72.9
69.6
Average days in cage
56
61
58
62
Average daily weight gain (gr).
545
436
590
470
After two to three months, the calves are transferred to the
fattening pen (3/4” RT-75O apparatus installed in Oct. 1986) until the age of
11-12 months. Because of budget and manpower limitations, as well as an
overcrowding problem, separation into test and control groups was dispensed
with. Weight gains, beef quality (lean-to-fat proportion) and general health
data are recorded. There is also qualitative inspection, for comparison n
available past data and with information provided by neighbouring settlements
practising the same husbandry methods.
A population of 150 calves, separated by partitions in age groups (an open yard provided for
each) is observed over a period of a year and a half, with the following
findings:
-The youngest group achieved an average daily
weight gain of 1400 g per head; overall average for all groups throughout the
observation period - 1200 to .1300 g per head.
General state of health - excellent.
Beef quality (as established after
slaughtering)-likewise excellent, hence the specific demand for these calves by cattle buyers and good
prices for the beef.
The above encouraging results were achieved
in spite of unsatisfactory accommodation and a relatively inexpensive diet
compared with neighboring settlements
(c) Milk
Goats and Meat Kids (Moshav Kefar
Yehezkel)
A flock of milk goats (250 heads) grazes for half a
day and is given ensilage and forage in the feed, with untreated drinking water
until noon, and from noon until next morning - water
treated with a 1/2” RT-500 K apparatus. The treated water is also supplied for
the kids and to the local dairy plant (cheese and milk production). Kids
(150-200 head per year) are fattened until the age of 8 months and marketed for
meat (average weight - 50-60 kg per head). Milk yield,
weight gain of the kids, fertility and health are observed.
Results are favorable throughout.
(d) Sheep - Milk and Mutton (Zaid farm, near Kiryat Tivon)
RT-750 k, 3/4” apparatus installed in
December 1987, in pipeline supplying drinking water for the whole farm except
for a control group of lambs. Highly favorable preliminary findings.
(e) Pork Pigs (Nazareth)
Herd of 1500 head, separated in age groups,
given granulated mixed feed, yellow cheese waste and biscuit waste. Monthly
meat yield - about 30 tons. 1”, RT-l000 apparatus installed
in Jan. 1988, in pipeline for selected groups. Weight gain, general health,
fertility of farrowing sows,
development of litters (kept with dams for two months prior to separation).
Findings: improved rate of growth and pork
quality (higher lean-to-fat proportion), higher rate of fertilization, reduced
mortality).
4. POULTRY
This section deals with chickens (fattening and breeding),
geese (fattening) , and turkeys (breeding).
(a) Laying
Chickens, Heavy Breeding (Gevat)
1/2” RT-500 apparatus installed in April
1987 in drinking-water system, with continuous treatment throughout the season
provided by means of a circulation pump. The experiment covered
three pens (about 4500 birds each) equipped with sophisticated microclimate
control instrumentation and with automatic feeding and egg-harvesting
equipment. One pen represents the test group, the other two - the control group. Onset and volume of laying, shell quality
(breakage rate), fertility of eggs, hatching rate,
general health, mortality are observed.
The flock in the three pens had to be
disposed of in mid-September 1987 because of respiratory disorders, but
available findings indicate a highly favorable effect in the test group:
·
Early laying.
·
Significant superiority in egg
yield throughout the laying period.
·
3-5% superiority in egg
fertility.
·
Reduced mortality.
No difference was observed with regard to
breakage and to shell thickness.
(b) Breeding
Pen (Kibbutz Ginegar)
Also a three-pen farm of the same size as
that of Gevat. Similar apparatus (RT-500, 1/2”) installed Sept. 1987, for an
existing three-weeks-old flock. Here one pen represents the test group, another
the control group, and the third is given untreated water and a boosted diet
compared with the test group. Results - Tables 7 through 9.
Main findings:
·
Laying in test group improved
by 5-10%, production of brood eggs -by 5%.
·
In the third pen - identical results with the test group, indicating that treatment
of the water is equivalent to boosting the diet, with the obvious economic
implications.
Remark: The test pens in the above two
experiments were chosen in the light of their inferior laying rates, due to
location and to climatic conditions.
(c) Brood
Turkeys (Moshav Nahalal)
Methodology, location of apparatus, water
circulation and supply, objects of test
as under (b) . Apparatus - 1/2”
RT-500 K, with a pump for continuous treatment. No control group - treated water given throughout. Owner acting as
observer, on the basis of his previous experience. Improved results - compared with the preceding laying season - in
terms of egg yield, shape, breakage, fertility and hatching rate.
(4) Green
Geese (Moshav 1-layogev)
Goslings kept in the pen until the age of
two months, then transferred to another pen for fattening (production of “foie
gras” for export), 3/4” RT-750 K apparatus with circulation pump installed in December
1987.
Improvement after two seasons in terms of
daily weight gain, general health, mortality. Owner’s return increased.
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
(1) Positive results of paramount
significance in livestock and poultry husbandry were
obtained. The economic advantage both in terms of cost-benefit and relative to
the investment in the apparatus is unambiguous. Findings indicate a
breakthrough of major impact.
(2) This is a unique pioneering study
conducted under field conditions. Further comparative experimentation is
recommended under close control by specialists.
(3) In the light of the possibilities
implied by the findings, allocation of resources is recommended for extension
to the following areas:
·
Algae and fishponds.
·
Membrane processes (organic and
inorganic).
·
Plants relevant to agriculture.
(4) Attention should be paid to important
parameters such as water quality and throughput, mode of supply, operation and
maintenance (technique and schedule) of magnetic apparatus. The latter should
also be optimized with regard to the magnetic circuit, geometry, capacity and
field gradient - with a view to peak performance.
(5) The mechanism underlying the magnetic
effect should be identified, in the light of the findings.
(6) Following the present in-vivo study, an
in-vitro counterpart is emphatically recommended.
(7) Considering the observed wide
variability of the water throughput due to diurnal and seasonal fluctuations,
to the size of the test population, to the quality of the water and diet - the magnetic apparatus is incapable, in principle, of optimal
performance at all times. Accordingly, it is recommended that the magnet be
designed for a range of throughputs, and/or combined with a permanent
circulation system.
(8) A considerable nationwide effort is in
progress in Israel
with regard to improved animal nutrition. Should this effort be augmented with
a parallel one with regard to the drinking water, a major contribution would
result to the standard of the country’s agriculture.
(9) The commercial potentialities of the
topic presented in this report are inexhaustible.
Dairy Herd Case Report
Mike Denny
was introduced to magnets when we suggested trying a Bioflow for his shoulder.
He had suffered ligament damagewhen he fell through the calf house roof that
he was mending. Physiotherapy had not eased the painand he was unable to sleepon his bad shoulder or raise his arm above his
head. Three weeks after wearing a Bioflow magnetic wristband he could do both. We then told him about good results we had had on farms putting magnets on the
water supply and he agreed to try H2Flows in the parlour and on the water
trough for the milkingcows. In summer he put them on the
outside supply.
He is
convinced that the cowsare much healthier since fitting the H2Flows.
There has been less respiratory disease, less stomach bacteria, less footproblems and milk feverhas gone down dramatically this year. He had
had to have the vet less times than he had ever known. Two years ago he had 8
cases of e-coli mastitisbut this year there has been only four and he
has been able to treat it - the cows recover more quickly and don’t lose the
quarter. “I’m convinced the magnets have helped this” said Mike. He also added
that cell counts have gone down by 100% and taking the pH out of the water has
dropped the rumen pHlevel enabling the cows to convert grass into
milk more efficiently. He has also had no instance of acetonaemia this year.
Fertility
in the country has not been good this year but Mike feels the magnets have
improved his herd’s fertility.
Out of59 cowsserved 71% held to the first service. 21 cows
served 75% held to the second service.
Last summer
Mike had a cow down with bad milk feverfor 48 hours. The vet came and diagnosed
damaged ligamentsand said the only solution was to put it down.
Mike decided to try a pair of the magnetic horse boots. The cow got up, hobbled
for three weeks but is now back in the herd walking normally.
‘Healthwise”
Mike said “I think the magnets are a big benefit”. To top it all milk yield is up, 7% over projection, and if this carries
on it will surpass last year’s production